The Amargosa Valley, a rugged and starkly beautiful desert straddling the California-Nevada border, is a region of historical significance and ecological fragility. Home to the rare Amargosa vole and the unique hydrology of the Amargosa River, this area has long been a focal point for conservation efforts. Despite its designation as a Wild and Scenic River, the Amargosa remains imperiled, in part due to the failure of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to implement a legally mandated management plan to protect the river and its delicate ecosystem.
A River Through the Desert: History of the Amargosa
The Amargosa River is a rare, largely underground waterway that emerges periodically to create isolated wetland habitats in an otherwise arid environment. Historically, the valley was an essential corridor for Indigenous communities, later becoming a key route during the westward expansion of the United States. The town of Tecopa is situated near the river and has long been known for its mineral-rich hot springs, attracting visitors and settlers alike. However, the river’s greatest value lies in its role as a lifeline for desert wildlife.
In 2009, Congress designated portions of the Amargosa River under the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. This designation was meant to protect the river’s free-flowing condition, water quality, and ecological values. However, the federal protection that should have ensured careful management has been undermined by a lack of follow-through by the BLM, the agency responsible for overseeing these lands.
BLM’s Neglect and the Legal Challenge
A recent legal complaint filed by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) against the BLM highlights the agency’s failure to manage recreational impacts in critical habitats along the river, particularly at Borehole Spring. The spring, an artificial but vital water source created by mineral exploration in the 1970s, now supports the most stable population of the endangered Amargosa vole.
Despite the vole’s perilous status BLM has done little to mitigate human-caused threats. According to the CBD lawsuit, the agency has failed to reinitiate mandatory Endangered Species Act consultations, even as studies confirm that increased recreational use at Borehole Spring is degrading vole habitat. While CBD does not want the spring to be closed to recreation, they do want it to be managed well, including interpretive signage and potentially a bathroom.
Tourists, drawn by internet-fueled hype about the so-called “Tecopa Mud Baths,” visit the site in large numbers. Monitoring data from conservationists has recorded upwards of 30 people at a time, with visitors engaging in disruptive activities such as off-road driving, camping, and even harvesting the spring’s mud for resale. With no sanitation facilities in place, human waste has been documented in the marsh, further threatening the fragile ecosystem.
BLM’s own management directives, outlined in the California Desert Conservation Area Plan and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, call for habitat protection measures, including securing water rights and preventing damage to wetlands. However, the agency has failed to implement the necessary protections.
Adding to these failures, the deadline for the mandatory management plan has now been extended to September 30, 2025, after previous deadlines came and went without action from the BLM. This continued delay further endangers the Amargosa River and the species that rely on it.
The Larger Picture: Water Scarcity and Conservation Failures
Beyond the immediate threats of unmanaged recreation, the Amargosa River system faces a long-term existential threat from groundwater overuse. Pumping in Amargosa Valley, Nevada, and Pahrump, Nevada, threatens the very springs that sustain life in the Tecopa region. The 1997 Amargosa Vole Recovery Plan identified groundwater conservation as a priority, yet little progress has been made in securing long-term water availability.
In addition to legal pressure from conservation groups, local efforts have sought to restore vole habitat through wetland rehabilitation and water flow management. In 2014, emergency interventions—such as installing water control structures to stabilize marshes—helped stave off vole extinction. However, these efforts require continuous maintenance and support, something that remains uncertain given BLM’s track record of inaction.
What Comes Next?
With legal action now underway, pressure is mounting on the BLM to comply with its obligations under the Endangered Species Act and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The CBD’s lawsuit demands that the agency reinitiate consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and take immediate steps to curb habitat destruction.
While the fate of the Amargosa vole remains uncertain, one thing is clear: without intervention, both the river and the species that depend on it will continue to suffer. The failure to implement a meaningful management plan not only threatens one of the rarest mammals in North America but also undermines the very purpose of federal conservation laws meant to protect places like the Amargosa Wild and Scenic River.
The future of the Amargosa is not yet written, but time is running out. Whether through legal mandate or a newfound commitment to conservation, decisive action is needed to protect this fragile desert oasis before it is too late.
Leave a Reply